(source)
Read the whole story here. More iconic images of human rights violations.

30 Jan 1968, Da Nang, South Vietnam. A South Vietnamese woman running past a dead body. Image by Bettmann/CORBIS
Also notice the Jeep in the background: flat tire, blood and possibly another corpse. More on Vietnam. More iconic images of human rights violations.

when you’re affected by status quo bias, all places where you can go right or left rather than merely straight forward look dangerous
Status quo bias is an irrational preference for the current state of affairs, even when there are no obvious reasons why this state of affairs should be preferred over possible and knowable alternatives.
A preference for the status quo is not always a bias and can be entirely rational in some cases:
When a preference for the status quo is a form of reasonable risk avoidance, then it’s also wrong to call it a bias: it’s true that sticking with what worked in the past is a safe option when the consequences or costs of alternatives – compared to the cost of existing arrangements – are uncertain or unknowable.
However, people also tend to stick with proven options when the respective costs of different options are clear and an alternative is less costly than the status quo. We sometimes even prefer the status quo when costs aren’t an issue at all. In those cases, it’s correct to call our preferences a bias. Maybe the bias occurs because people don’t want to invest the effort of looking for alternatives and calculating all the costs. Status quo requires no mental effort. Choice is difficult, hence the tendency to do nothing. Or maybe cost calculations – when they are performed – are distorted because people wrongly attribute goodness to longevity. People often believe that something must be worth something if it has existed or if it has been practiced for a long time.
Cost calculations can also be biased because people tend to weigh the potential losses of switching from the status quo more heavily than the potential gains. This is called loss aversion - people prefer avoiding losses to acquiring gains even if the gains objectively outweigh the losses – and it could explain a preference for the status quo in the presence of alternatives that are objectively less costly. But status quo bias occurs even when there are no losses or gains from alternatives (experiments have shown that just designating an option as the status quo makes people rate it more highly). Hence, status quo bias is not always a form of loss aversion. Maybe regret avoidance plays a role (a past experience of regret teaches people to avoid decisions that imply change). Or an overvaluation of the virtue of consistency. Or the sunk cost fallacy: American involvement in Vietnam continued for years despite massive loss of lives, precisely because this loss would make defeat costly.
This last example shows how status quo bias can cause human rights violations. Other examples:
Something on the related endowment effect is here. More posts in this series are here.

1966, wounded Marine Gunnery Sgt. Jeremiah Purdie (center) moves to try and comfort a stricken comrade after a fierce firefight during the Vietnam War. Photographed for an essay that ran in the October 28, 1966, issue of LIFE, this Larry Burrows picture — now regarded as one of the handful of utterly indispensable images from the war — did not appear in the magazine until February 1971
More on Vietnam here and here. More iconic images of human rights violations.
The original is here. For the story on the Tienanmen Square protests and the violent crackdown, see here. More on freedom of the press here.
This is another one:
The original. More human rights ads.
These are the countries that take the “war on drugs” almost literally and execute drug offenders on a large scale:
Iran:
Saudi Arabia:
Singapore:
Malaysia:
Vietnam:
In China, the numbers are difficult to ascertain given the government’s tough stance on secrecy. Thousands are executed each year, but one can’t be more precise than that.
The Dui Hua Foundation suggests that approximately 5,000 people were executed in 2009, and states that “the manufacture, transport, smuggling, or trafficking of illegal drugs account for a significant number of executions reported by Chinese media”. (source)
Other countries in Asia also use the death penalty as a punishment for drug crimes, but to a lesser extent.
More on capital punishment in China, Iran and Saudi Arabia.
On June 8th, 1972, Associated Press photographer Nick Ut takes a picture of a 9-year-old Vietnamese girl named Phan Thi Kim Phuc running away from an air strike, with her clothes burnt off and her skin hanging in shreds as a result of napalm.
Here are stills from a movie shot by photo-journalists Alan Downes (ITN) and Le Phuc Dinh (NBC), which shows the events just before and after the iconic photograph of Kim Phuc was taken:
Here’s the video (warning: it’s extremely distressing):
Amazingly, the girl survived, thanks in part to Ut who took her to hospital. Here she is today:
Thich Quang Duc was born in 1897 and was a Vietnamese Buddhist monk. He burned himself to death on a busy street in Saigon on June 11, 1963 as a protest against South Vietam’s persecution of Buddhists.
More on religious freedom here. Suggest a new image in this series.