activism, housing, law, most absurd human rights violations

The Most Absurd Human Rights Violations (81): Arrested for Feeding the Homeless

chaplin modern times

Charles Chaplin and Paulette Goddard in a scene from Modern Times

Members of Orlando Food Not Bombs were arrested … when police said they violated a city ordinance by feeding the homeless in Lake Eola Park. … The penalty for violating Orlando’s ordinance is 60 days in jail, a $500 fine or both. … Orlando police arrested five more activists from behind a makeshift buffet table at Lake Eola Park …, bringing to a dozen the number charged in the past week with violating city restrictions on feeding the homeless. The members of the group Food Not Bombs were ladling out corn on the cob, rice, beans and watermelon to about 35 people when they were handcuffed. … They were violating a controversial city ordinance that prohibits sharing food with large groups in a downtown city park more than twice a year. (source, source)

More absurd human rights violations here.

Standard
democracy, equality, why do countries become/remain democracies

Why Do Countries Become/Remain Democracies? Or Don’t? (17): Inequality

Riot scene from Chaplin's Modern Times

Riot scene from Chaplin's Modern Times

A transition to democratic government is very unlikely when the population of a country is sharply divided in unequal classes or groups. Some of these groups will try to monopolize political power in order to repress rival groups and maintain the distributional status quo. For example, when there’s a division between a landowning class or an industrial class on the one hand, and a group of impoverished rural or urban workers on the other hand, then the former group will fear election victories by the latter group because such victories will lead to redistribution of land or other assets. Privileged classes will therefore work against democracy. As a result of this, the working classes will radicalize and aim for a revolutionary overthrow and the abolition of property rights altogether, thereby also making democracy less likely.

Something like this is arguably a good description of much of the recent history of Latin America. Positively stated: more economic equality – perhaps following the expansion of a middle class – will make democracy more viable, since different groups have less to lose from a democratic power shift.

But polarization doesn’t have to be exclusively economic in nature. Religious or ethnic divisions can also hinder the creation and continuity of democracy, especially when there’s also a spatial division between groups. This is probably what happened in Africa since decolonization. Of course, non-economic divisions are often exacerbated by economic ones, in which case we can hope that more economic equality will take the sting out of ethnic divisions.

More posts in this series are here.

Standard