democracy, poverty, why do we need human rights

Why Do We Need Human Rights? (10): Why Do We Need Democracy?

Regular readers will know that I see democracy as a human rights issue. The standard human rights texts (declarations, treaties and constitutions) all provide a right of the people of a nation to take part in the government, choose representatives in free elections etc. As with human rights in general, many people are in favor of democracy, but are unable to say why, or are unable to agree on the reasons why they are in favor. Some people may not have a particular reason to favor democracy, apart from a pragmatic one: it has worked quite well, especially compared to other forms of government that have been tried before, and it’s such a fuss to change.

Those who have reasons can be divided into two “camps”: those who view democracy as the best means to an independently valuable  goal, and those who view democracy as intrinsically valuable. The former group is the most numerous (and includes me). An instrumental justification of democracy can take many different forms, depending on the ultimate goal that is supposed to be promoted by democracy. The most common forms are:

  • Democracy promotes prosperity, economic growth and poverty reduction. Read more here and here.
  • Democracy promotes peace (internally and externally). See here, here and here.
  • Democracy leads to better political decisions. See here, here and here.
  • Democracy leads to less repression and more respect for human rights. See here, here, here, here and here.

I believe all of these statements are very persuasive, and taken together they form a very powerful justification of democracy (although we may need to agree on a very specific definition of democracy in order to be convinced by these statements – but that’s another discussion).

The non-instrumental justification, the one that says that democracy is good, not because of what it produces, but because of what it is, is also very interesting and persuasive. It focuses on what happens to people when they participate in government, what happens when democracy takes place, not what happens after it has taken place. So instead of pointing to beneficial consequences of democracy – more prosperity, more peace etc. – it points to the benefits of community, association, participation, self-government, self-determination etc. and how these things improve people’s characters, virtues and happiness. Read more here.

The only problem I have with this non-instrumental approach in which democracy is an end in itself, is that it tends to collapse into the instrumental approach: if democracy improves people’s character, then it’s also instrumental. It’s only an end in itself in the sense that it’s product doesn’t appear afterwards (like peace follows from democratic rule), but is simultaneous with it (people’s characters and virtues improve because of democracy, but only as long as democracy “happens”).

Banksy, monkey parliament

Banksy, monkey parliament

(source, there’s more Banksy here)

However, often it’s quite irrelevant which type of justification of democracy we prefer, and how successful (or not) the chosen justification is. Such exercises can be no more than “preaching to the choir”, intellectually interesting but practically irrelevant. People who already accept democracy don’t need a philosophical explanation of why democracy is so wonderful. And people who don’t accept democracy are often immune to rational justifications or to philosophy in general. Good luck approaching the Taliban with a philosophy paper on the benefits of democracy… (In fact, good luck approaching them at all).

More here. See some statistics on public support for democracy here.


22 thoughts on “Why Do We Need Human Rights? (10): Why Do We Need Democracy?

  1. Pingback: What is Democracy? (39): Something in Need of Innovation « P.A.P. Blog – Human Rights Etc.

  2. Pingback: Why Do Countries Become/Remain Democracies? Or Don’t? (2): Education and Prosperity « P.A.P. Blog – Human Rights Etc.

  3. Pingback: Measuring Democracy (5): The Freedom House “Freedom in the World” Report « P.A.P. Blog – Human Rights Etc.

  4. Pingback: Why Do Countries Become/Remain Democracies? Or Don’t? (3): The Resource Curse? « P.A.P. Blog – Human Rights Etc.

  5. Pingback: The Economic Case against Democracy and Human Rights, Ctd. « P.A.P. Blog – Human Rights Etc.

  6. Pingback: Political Graffiti (113): Don’t Vote | P.a.p.-Blog, Human Rights Etc.

  7. Pingback: Why Do Countries Become/Remain Democracies? Or Don’t? (7): Assassination | P.a.p.-Blog, Human Rights Etc.

  8. Pingback: What is Democracy? (46): Kallocracy? | P.a.p.-Blog | Human Rights Etc.

  9. meh says:

    aww, how cute, you honestly think that you get real choice between parties that are funded by the same special interest groups, have fun voting, make sure you bring your helmet.

  10. Pingback: What is Democracy? (48): The Effect of Unconscious Priming? | P.a.p.-Blog | Human Rights Etc.

  11. Pingback: Why Do We Need Human Rights? Ctd. | P.a.p.-Blog | Human Rights Etc.

  12. Pingback: What Are Human Rights? (38): Means or Goals? | P.a.p.-Blog, Human Rights Etc.

  13. Pingback: What is Democracy? (62): Impossible? | P.a.p.-Blog, Human Rights Etc.

  14. Pingback: Why Do We Need Human Rights? (35): Why Do We Need Democracy? | P.a.p.-Blog, Human Rights Etc.

  15. Pingback: What is Democracy? (65): A Political Decision Procedure Distorted by the Order Effect | P.a.p.-Blog, Human Rights Etc.

  16. Pingback: What is Democracy? (71): An Instantaneous Face-Based Competence Assessment | P.a.p.-Blog // Human Rights Etc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s